Skip to main content

Lynbrook vs Upper Lurg

Property investment comparison - Lynbrook, VIC 3975 vs Upper Lurg, VIC 3673

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lynbrook wins 4, Upper Lurg wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLynbrookUpper Lurg
Median house price$895K$900K
Median unit price$670K$485K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.65%2.86%
Gross rental yield (units)4.50%2.03%
1-year house growth+7.3%-
3-year house growth+14.2%-
Vacancy rate1.7%3.0%
Population9,121107

Lynbrook vs Upper Lurg: what the numbers say

The median house price is $895K in Lynbrook and $900K in Upper Lurg, so Lynbrook is the cheaper entry point, with Upper Lurg houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Lynbrook sits at a median of $670K against $485K in Upper Lurg, which makes Upper Lurg the more affordable unit market and Lynbrook the pricier one.

On cash flow, Lynbrook leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.65%, compared with 2.86% in Upper Lurg, a gap of 0.79 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Lynbrook and 3.0% in Upper Lurg, so landlords in Lynbrook face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lynbrook is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,121 against 107, roughly 85 times the size of Upper Lurg; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lynbrook for rental income, Lynbrook for a lower purchase price, Lynbrook for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison