Skip to main content

Lynwood vs Rosemeadow

Property investment comparison - Lynwood, NSW 2477 vs Rosemeadow, NSW 2560

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lynwood wins 3, Rosemeadow wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLynwoodRosemeadow
Median house price$1M$1M
Median unit price$645K$815K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.25%3.27%
Gross rental yield (units)5.52%3.29%
1-year house growth-+8.6%
3-year house growth-+23.0%
Vacancy rate0.3%1.2%
Population2158,007

Lynwood vs Rosemeadow: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1M in Lynwood and $1M in Rosemeadow.

For units, Lynwood sits at a median of $645K against $815K in Rosemeadow, which makes Lynwood the more affordable unit market and Rosemeadow the pricier one.

On cash flow, Rosemeadow leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.27%, compared with 2.25% in Lynwood, a gap of 1.02 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Lynwood and 1.2% in Rosemeadow, so landlords in Lynwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rosemeadow is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,007 against 215, roughly 37 times the size of Lynwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rosemeadow for rental income, Lynwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison