Lynwood vs Ruse
Property investment comparison - Lynwood, NSW 2477 vs Ruse, NSW 2560
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lynwood wins 1, Ruse wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Lynwood | Ruse |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1M | $1M |
| Median unit price | $645K | $425K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.25% | 3.44% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.52% | 6.86% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +10.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +27.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.3% | 1.1% |
| Population | 215 | 5,632 |
Lynwood vs Ruse: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1M in Lynwood and $1M in Ruse.
For units, Lynwood sits at a median of $645K against $425K in Ruse, which makes Ruse the more affordable unit market and Lynwood the pricier one.
On cash flow, Ruse leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.44%, compared with 2.25% in Lynwood, a gap of 1.19 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Lynwood and 1.1% in Ruse, so landlords in Lynwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Ruse is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,632 against 215, roughly 26 times the size of Lynwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ruse for rental income, Lynwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison