Skip to main content

Lynwood vs Milpara

Property investment comparison - Lynwood, WA 6147 vs Milpara, WA 6330

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lynwood wins 2, Milpara wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLynwoodMilpara
Median house price$880K$875K
Median unit price-$475K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.56%
Gross rental yield (units)5.20%6.57%
1-year house growth+19.6%+20.2%
3-year house growth+76.2%+75.5%
Vacancy rate1.2%2.2%
Population3,541953

Lynwood vs Milpara: what the numbers say

The median house price is $880K in Lynwood and $875K in Milpara, so Milpara is the cheaper entry point, with Lynwood houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Milpara leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.56%, compared with 4.40% in Lynwood, a gap of 0.16 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.6% in Lynwood and +20.2% in Milpara, so recent momentum favours Milpara, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Lynwood houses are +76.2% and Milpara houses +75.5%, so Lynwood has compounded faster than Milpara over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Lynwood and 2.2% in Milpara, so landlords in Lynwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lynwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,541 against 953, roughly 3.7 times the size of Milpara; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Milpara for rental income, Milpara for a lower purchase price, Milpara for recent price momentum, Lynwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison