Skip to main content

Maffra vs Tinamba

Property investment comparison - Maffra, VIC 3860 vs Tinamba, VIC 3859

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Maffra wins 2, Tinamba wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMaffraTinamba
Median house price$500K$495K
Median unit price$360K$440K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.98%-
Gross rental yield (units)-3.02%
1-year house growth+12.5%+2.5%
3-year house growth+10.6%-
Vacancy rate1.5%1.4%
Population5,384358

Maffra vs Tinamba: what the numbers say

The median house price is $500K in Maffra and $495K in Tinamba, so Tinamba is the cheaper entry point, with Maffra houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Maffra sits at a median of $360K against $440K in Tinamba, which makes Maffra the more affordable unit market and Tinamba the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.5% in Maffra and +2.5% in Tinamba, so recent momentum favours Maffra, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Tinamba and 1.5% in Maffra, so landlords in Tinamba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Maffra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,384 against 358, roughly 15 times the size of Tinamba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tinamba for a lower purchase price, Maffra for recent price momentum, Tinamba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Maffra vs Tinamba: Property Investment Comparison (2026)