Maldon vs Mockinya
Property investment comparison - Maldon, VIC 3463 vs Mockinya, VIC 3401
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Maldon wins 1, Mockinya wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Maldon | Mockinya |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $730K | $730K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.33% | 2.79% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.35% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +4.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -1.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | - |
| Population | 1,665 | 30 |
Maldon vs Mockinya: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Maldon and $730K in Mockinya.
On cash flow, Maldon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.33%, compared with 2.79% in Mockinya, a gap of 0.54 percentage points.
Maldon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,665 against 30, roughly 56 times the size of Mockinya; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Maldon for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison