Skip to main content

Mandalong vs Picnic Point

Property investment comparison - Mandalong, NSW 2264 vs Picnic Point, NSW 2213

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mandalong wins 3, Picnic Point wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMandalongPicnic Point
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$590K$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.06%2.90%
Gross rental yield (units)5.27%3.41%
1-year house growth-+7.6%
3-year house growth-+10.5%
Vacancy rate2.5%2.3%
Population4336,413

Mandalong vs Picnic Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Mandalong and $1.8M in Picnic Point, so Mandalong is the cheaper entry point, with Picnic Point houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Mandalong sits at a median of $590K against $1.3M in Picnic Point, which makes Mandalong the more affordable unit market and Picnic Point the pricier one.

On cash flow, Picnic Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.90%, compared with 2.06% in Mandalong, a gap of 0.84 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 2.3% in Picnic Point and 2.5% in Mandalong, so landlords in Picnic Point face less competition for tenants.

Picnic Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,413 against 433, roughly 15 times the size of Mandalong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Picnic Point for rental income, Mandalong for a lower purchase price, Picnic Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison