Skip to main content

Manyana vs Wyong

Property investment comparison - Manyana, NSW 2539 vs Wyong, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Manyana wins 2, Wyong wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricManyanaWyong
Median house price$905K$905K
Median unit price$695K$565K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.87%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.06%4.90%
1-year house growth-2.2%+8.1%
3-year house growth+13.4%+8.6%
Vacancy rate0.7%0.9%
Population6704,530

Manyana vs Wyong: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $905K in Manyana and $905K in Wyong.

For units, Manyana sits at a median of $695K against $565K in Wyong, which makes Wyong the more affordable unit market and Manyana the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -2.2% in Manyana and +8.1% in Wyong, so recent momentum favours Wyong, while Manyana went backwards.

Looking back three years, Manyana houses are +13.4% and Wyong houses +8.6%, so Manyana has compounded faster than Wyong over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Manyana and 0.9% in Wyong, so landlords in Manyana face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wyong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,530 against 670, roughly 7 times the size of Manyana; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wyong for recent price momentum, Manyana for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison