Mapleton vs Ormeau
Property investment comparison - Mapleton, QLD 4560 vs Ormeau, QLD 4208
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mapleton wins 2, Ormeau wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Mapleton | Ormeau |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $810K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.83% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.71% | 4.19% |
| 1-year house growth | +12.7%estimate | +17.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 0.8% |
| Population | 1,661 | 15,938 |
Mapleton vs Ormeau: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Mapleton and $1.1M in Ormeau.
Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Mapleton (an estimate) and +17.1% in Ormeau (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Ormeau, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Mapleton and 0.8% in Ormeau, so landlords in Mapleton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Ormeau is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,938 against 1,661, roughly 10 times the size of Mapleton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ormeau for recent price momentum, Mapleton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison