Skip to main content

Marsfield vs Monterey

Property investment comparison - Marsfield, NSW 2122 vs Monterey, NSW 2217

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Marsfield wins 3, Monterey wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMarsfieldMonterey
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$1.0M$930K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.40%
Gross rental yield (units)3.63%3.88%
1-year house growth+3.8%+1.2%estimate
3-year house growth+1.7%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.6%
Population12,4924,619

Marsfield vs Monterey: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Marsfield and $2.6M in Monterey, so Marsfield is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Marsfield sits at a median of $1.0M against $930K in Monterey, which makes Monterey the more affordable unit market and Marsfield the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.8% in Marsfield and +1.2% in Monterey (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Marsfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Marsfield and 1.6% in Monterey, so landlords in Marsfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Marsfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,492 against 4,619, roughly 2.7 times the size of Monterey; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Marsfield for a lower purchase price, Marsfield for recent price momentum, Marsfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison