Skip to main content

Marsfield vs Woolooware

Property investment comparison - Marsfield, NSW 2122 vs Woolooware, NSW 2230

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Marsfield wins 1, Woolooware wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMarsfieldWoolooware
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$1.0M$995K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)3.63%3.92%
1-year house growth+3.8%+6.3%estimate
3-year house growth+1.7%-
Vacancy rate1.4%2.4%
Population12,4925,060

Marsfield vs Woolooware: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Marsfield and $2.6M in Woolooware, so Woolooware is the cheaper entry point, with Marsfield houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Marsfield sits at a median of $1.0M against $995K in Woolooware, which makes Woolooware the more affordable unit market and Marsfield the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.8% in Marsfield and +6.3% in Woolooware (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Woolooware, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Marsfield and 2.4% in Woolooware, so landlords in Marsfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Marsfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,492 against 5,060, roughly 2.5 times the size of Woolooware; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woolooware for a lower purchase price, Woolooware for recent price momentum, Marsfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison