Skip to main content

Maryland vs Tingira Heights

Property investment comparison - Maryland, NSW 2287 vs Tingira Heights, NSW 2290

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Maryland wins 1, Tingira Heights wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMarylandTingira Heights
Median house price$925K$925K
Median unit price-$660K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.09%4.26%
Gross rental yield (units)4.15%4.51%
1-year house growth+12.0%+6.6%estimate
3-year house growth+23.1%-
Vacancy rate1.0%0.6%
Population7,7142,043

Maryland vs Tingira Heights: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $925K in Maryland and $925K in Tingira Heights.

On cash flow, Tingira Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.26%, compared with 4.09% in Maryland, a gap of 0.17 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Maryland and +6.6% in Tingira Heights (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Maryland, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Tingira Heights and 1.0% in Maryland, so landlords in Tingira Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Maryland is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,714 against 2,043, roughly 3.8 times the size of Tingira Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tingira Heights for rental income, Maryland for recent price momentum, Tingira Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison