Skip to main content

Mascot vs Westleigh

Property investment comparison - Mascot, NSW 2020 vs Westleigh, NSW 2120

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mascot wins 5, Westleigh wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMascotWestleigh
Median house price$2.0M$2M
Median unit price$900K$735K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.95%2.93%
Gross rental yield (units)5.78%4.75%
1-year house growth+5.0%-2.8%
3-year house growth+2.2%+1.4%
Vacancy rate2.4%2.5%
Population21,5914,501

Mascot vs Westleigh: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Mascot and $2M in Westleigh, so Westleigh is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Mascot sits at a median of $900K against $735K in Westleigh, which makes Westleigh the more affordable unit market and Mascot the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.95% in Mascot and 2.93% in Westleigh, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.0% in Mascot and -2.8% in Westleigh, so recent momentum favours Mascot, while Westleigh went backwards.

Looking back three years, Mascot houses are +2.2% and Westleigh houses +1.4%, so Mascot has compounded faster than Westleigh over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Mascot and 2.5% in Westleigh, so landlords in Mascot face less competition for tenants.

Mascot is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,591 against 4,501, roughly 4.8 times the size of Westleigh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Westleigh for a lower purchase price, Mascot for recent price momentum, Mascot for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison