Skip to main content

Mayfield vs Tathra

Property investment comparison - Mayfield, NSW 2304 vs Tathra, NSW 2550

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mayfield wins 3, Tathra wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMayfieldTathra
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$830K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.47%2.97%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+10.5%+5.6%
3-year house growth+27.1%-1.4%
Vacancy rate1.3%1.3%
Population9,7601,527

Mayfield vs Tathra: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Mayfield and $1.1M in Tathra.

On cash flow, Mayfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.47%, compared with 2.97% in Tathra, a gap of 0.50 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.5% in Mayfield and +5.6% in Tathra, so recent momentum favours Mayfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Mayfield houses are +27.1% and Tathra houses -1.4%, so Mayfield has compounded faster than Tathra over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Tathra and 1.3% in Mayfield, so landlords in Tathra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mayfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,760 against 1,527, roughly 6 times the size of Tathra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mayfield for rental income, Mayfield for recent price momentum, Tathra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison