Skip to main content

Mayfield vs Metford

Property investment comparison - Mayfield, NSW 2540 vs Metford, NSW 2323

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mayfield wins 1, Metford wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMayfieldMetford
Median house price$820K$820K
Median unit price$625K$540K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.16%4.15%
Gross rental yield (units)4.31%4.65%
1-year house growth-15.2%estimate+12.1%
3-year house growth-+21.5%
Vacancy rate2.4%0.4%
Population9,8564,707

Mayfield vs Metford: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $820K in Mayfield and $820K in Metford.

For units, Mayfield sits at a median of $625K against $540K in Metford, which makes Metford the more affordable unit market and Mayfield the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.16% in Mayfield and 4.15% in Metford, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved -15.2% in Mayfield (an estimate) and +12.1% in Metford, so recent momentum favours Metford, while Mayfield went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Metford and 2.4% in Mayfield, so landlords in Metford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mayfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,856 against 4,707, roughly 2.1 times the size of Metford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Metford for recent price momentum, Metford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison