Skip to main content

Maylands vs Riverton

Property investment comparison - Maylands, WA 6051 vs Riverton, WA 6148

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Maylands wins 2, Riverton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMaylandsRiverton
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$620K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.33%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.25%4.10%
1-year house growth+17.9%+18.8%
3-year house growth+76.1%+78.1%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.0%
Population13,1996,078

Maylands vs Riverton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Maylands and $1.3M in Riverton.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.9% in Maylands and +18.8% in Riverton, so recent momentum favours Riverton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Maylands houses are +76.1% and Riverton houses +78.1%, so Riverton has compounded faster than Maylands over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Maylands and 1.0% in Riverton, so landlords in Maylands face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Maylands is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,199 against 6,078, roughly 2.2 times the size of Riverton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Riverton for recent price momentum, Maylands for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison