Skip to main content

McCracken vs O'Halloran Hill

Property investment comparison - McCracken, SA 5211 vs O'Halloran Hill, SA 5158

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: McCracken wins 4, O'Halloran Hill wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMcCrackenO'Halloran Hill
Median house price$850K$865K
Median unit price$375K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.77%3.73%
Gross rental yield (units)3.68%4.10%
1-year house growth+12.2%estimate+10.6%
3-year house growth-+33.5%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.6%
Population2,0762,722

McCracken vs O'Halloran Hill: what the numbers say

The median house price is $850K in McCracken and $865K in O'Halloran Hill, so McCracken is the cheaper entry point, with O'Halloran Hill houses about 2% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.77% in McCracken and 3.73% in O'Halloran Hill, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.2% in McCracken (an estimate) and +10.6% in O'Halloran Hill, so recent momentum favours McCracken, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in McCracken and 1.6% in O'Halloran Hill, so landlords in McCracken face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

O'Halloran Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,722 against 2,076, larger than McCracken; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: McCracken for a lower purchase price, McCracken for recent price momentum, McCracken for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison