McDowall vs Tabooba
Property investment comparison - McDowall, QLD 4053 vs Tabooba, QLD 4285
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: McDowall wins 2, Tabooba wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | McDowall | Tabooba |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | $990K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.20% | 2.55% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.02% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +15.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +37.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 0.8% |
| Population | 7,612 | 57 |
McDowall vs Tabooba: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.4M in McDowall and $1.4M in Tabooba, so McDowall is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, McDowall leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.20%, compared with 2.55% in Tabooba, a gap of 0.65 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Tabooba and 1.2% in McDowall, so landlords in Tabooba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
McDowall is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,612 against 57, roughly 134 times the size of Tabooba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: McDowall for rental income, McDowall for a lower purchase price, Tabooba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison