Skip to main content

Meadow vs Thrumster

Property investment comparison - Meadow, NSW 2795 vs Thrumster, NSW 2444

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Meadow wins 3, Thrumster wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMeadowThrumster
Median house price$915K$915K
Median unit price$465K$770K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.19%4.26%
Gross rental yield (units)5.15%4.49%
1-year house growth-+4.2%
3-year house growth-+9.6%
Vacancy rate0.8%2.3%
Population12,1692,382

Meadow vs Thrumster: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $915K in Meadow and $915K in Thrumster.

For units, Meadow sits at a median of $465K against $770K in Thrumster, which makes Meadow the more affordable unit market and Thrumster the pricier one.

On cash flow, Thrumster leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.26%, compared with 3.19% in Meadow, a gap of 1.07 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Meadow and 2.3% in Thrumster, so landlords in Meadow face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Meadow is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,169 against 2,382, roughly 5 times the size of Thrumster; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Thrumster for rental income, Meadow for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison