Skip to main content

Meadow vs Ulladulla

Property investment comparison - Meadow, NSW 2795 vs Ulladulla, NSW 2539

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Meadow wins 2, Ulladulla wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMeadowUlladulla
Median house price$915K$915K
Median unit price$465K$725K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.19%3.42%
Gross rental yield (units)5.15%4.10%
1-year house growth-+6.0%
3-year house growth-+6.3%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.7%
Population12,1697,262

Meadow vs Ulladulla: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $915K in Meadow and $915K in Ulladulla.

For units, Meadow sits at a median of $465K against $725K in Ulladulla, which makes Meadow the more affordable unit market and Ulladulla the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ulladulla leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.42%, compared with 3.19% in Meadow, a gap of 0.23 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Ulladulla and 0.8% in Meadow, so landlords in Ulladulla face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Meadow is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,169 against 7,262, larger than Ulladulla; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ulladulla for rental income, Ulladulla for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Meadow vs Ulladulla: Property Investment Comparison (2026)