Skip to main content

Middleton vs North Haven

Property investment comparison - Middleton, SA 5213 vs North Haven, SA 5018

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Middleton wins 1, North Haven wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMiddletonNorth Haven
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$565K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.06%3.43%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%-
1-year house growth+12.5%+11.8%estimate
3-year house growth+15.9%-
Vacancy rate1.9%0.6%
Population1,2985,585

Middleton vs North Haven: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Middleton and $1.0M in North Haven, so North Haven is the cheaper entry point, with Middleton houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, North Haven leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.43%, compared with 3.06% in Middleton, a gap of 0.37 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.5% in Middleton and +11.8% in North Haven (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Middleton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in North Haven and 1.9% in Middleton, so landlords in North Haven face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

North Haven is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,585 against 1,298, roughly 4.3 times the size of Middleton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: North Haven for rental income, North Haven for a lower purchase price, Middleton for recent price momentum, North Haven for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison