Skip to main content

Millfield vs Narellan

Property investment comparison - Millfield, NSW 2325 vs Narellan, NSW 2567

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Millfield wins 4, Narellan wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMillfieldNarellan
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$465K$770K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.43%3.21%
Gross rental yield (units)4.84%4.14%
1-year house growth+10.2%estimate+6.9%
3-year house growth-+12.9%
Vacancy rate1.3%2.4%
Population1,2823,358

Millfield vs Narellan: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Millfield and $1.1M in Narellan.

For units, Millfield sits at a median of $465K against $770K in Narellan, which makes Millfield the more affordable unit market and Narellan the pricier one.

On cash flow, Narellan leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.21%, compared with 2.43% in Millfield, a gap of 0.78 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.2% in Millfield (an estimate) and +6.9% in Narellan, so recent momentum favours Millfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Millfield and 2.4% in Narellan, so landlords in Millfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Narellan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,358 against 1,282, roughly 2.6 times the size of Millfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Narellan for rental income, Millfield for recent price momentum, Millfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison