Skip to main content

Milperra vs Woollamia

Property investment comparison - Milperra, NSW 2214 vs Woollamia, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Milperra wins 3, Woollamia wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMilperraWoollamia
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price-$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.50%2.17%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.29%
1-year house growth+7.7%-20.9%estimate
3-year house growth+25.3%-
Vacancy rate4.2%3.4%
Population4,074653

Milperra vs Woollamia: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Milperra and $1.6M in Woollamia, so Milperra is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Milperra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.50%, compared with 2.17% in Woollamia, a gap of 1.33 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.7% in Milperra and -20.9% in Woollamia (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Milperra, while Woollamia went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 3.4% in Woollamia and 4.2% in Milperra, so landlords in Woollamia face less competition for tenants.

Milperra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,074 against 653, roughly 6 times the size of Woollamia; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Milperra for rental income, Milperra for a lower purchase price, Milperra for recent price momentum, Woollamia for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison