Minmi vs Warnervale
Property investment comparison - Minmi, NSW 2287 vs Warnervale, NSW 2259
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Minmi wins 1, Warnervale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Minmi | Warnervale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $960K | $960K |
| Median unit price | $645K | $800K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | 4.26% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.35% |
| 1-year house growth | - | -4.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +8.9% |
| Vacancy rate | 5.6% | 3.6% |
| Population | 700 | 701 |
Minmi vs Warnervale: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $960K in Minmi and $960K in Warnervale.
For units, Minmi sits at a median of $645K against $800K in Warnervale, which makes Minmi the more affordable unit market and Warnervale the pricier one.
On cash flow, Warnervale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.26%, compared with 4.20% in Minmi, a gap of 0.06 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 3.6% in Warnervale and 5.6% in Minmi, so landlords in Warnervale face less competition for tenants.
Warnervale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 701 against 700, larger than Minmi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Warnervale for rental income, Warnervale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison