Skip to main content

Monterey vs Ryde

Property investment comparison - Monterey, NSW 2217 vs Ryde, NSW 2112

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Monterey wins 1, Ryde wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMontereyRyde
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$930K$740K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.40%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.88%4.88%
1-year house growth+1.2%estimate+1.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%1.5%
Population4,61931,907

Monterey vs Ryde: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.6M in Monterey and $2.6M in Ryde.

For units, Monterey sits at a median of $930K against $740K in Ryde, which makes Ryde the more affordable unit market and Monterey the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.2% in Monterey (an estimate) and +1.2% in Ryde (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Monterey, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Ryde and 1.6% in Monterey, so landlords in Ryde face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ryde is the bigger suburb, with a population of 31,907 against 4,619, roughly 7 times the size of Monterey; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Monterey for recent price momentum, Ryde for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison