Skip to main content

Mooloolah Valley vs Runcorn

Property investment comparison - Mooloolah Valley, QLD 4553 vs Runcorn, QLD 4113

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mooloolah Valley wins 2, Runcorn wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMooloolah ValleyRuncorn
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$805K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.37%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.45%4.30%
1-year house growth+14.9%+21.1%estimate
3-year house growth+34.1%-
Vacancy rate1.6%1.0%
Population3,62914,199

Mooloolah Valley vs Runcorn: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Mooloolah Valley and $1.3M in Runcorn, so Mooloolah Valley is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Mooloolah Valley and +21.1% in Runcorn (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Runcorn, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Runcorn and 1.6% in Mooloolah Valley, so landlords in Runcorn face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Runcorn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,199 against 3,629, roughly 3.9 times the size of Mooloolah Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mooloolah Valley for a lower purchase price, Runcorn for recent price momentum, Runcorn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison