Skip to main content

Moorabbin vs Pascoe Vale South

Property investment comparison - Moorabbin, VIC 3189 vs Pascoe Vale South, VIC 3044

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moorabbin wins 1, Pascoe Vale South wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoorabbinPascoe Vale South
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$765K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%2.89%
Gross rental yield (units)4.42%4.85%
1-year house growth+6.1%+6.2%estimate
3-year house growth-0.8%-
Vacancy rate1.0%0.8%
Population6,28710,534

Moorabbin vs Pascoe Vale South: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Moorabbin and $1.3M in Pascoe Vale South.

On cash flow, Moorabbin leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.20%, compared with 2.89% in Pascoe Vale South, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.1% in Moorabbin and +6.2% in Pascoe Vale South (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Pascoe Vale South, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Pascoe Vale South and 1.0% in Moorabbin, so landlords in Pascoe Vale South face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Pascoe Vale South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,534 against 6,287, larger than Moorabbin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Moorabbin for rental income, Pascoe Vale South for recent price momentum, Pascoe Vale South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison