Skip to main content

Moorland vs Oberon

Property investment comparison - Moorland, NSW 2443 vs Oberon, NSW 2787

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moorland wins 0, Oberon wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoorlandOberon
Median house price$560K$560K
Median unit price$570K$445K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.38%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.90%4.70%
1-year house growth+3.4%estimate+5.0%
3-year house growth-+13.4%
Vacancy rate2.0%1.5%
Population5163,319

Moorland vs Oberon: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $560K in Moorland and $560K in Oberon.

For units, Moorland sits at a median of $570K against $445K in Oberon, which makes Oberon the more affordable unit market and Moorland the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.4% in Moorland (an estimate) and +5.0% in Oberon, so recent momentum favours Oberon, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Oberon and 2.0% in Moorland, so landlords in Oberon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oberon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,319 against 516, roughly 6 times the size of Moorland; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oberon for recent price momentum, Oberon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison