Skip to main content

Moorooka vs Wynnum

Property investment comparison - Moorooka, QLD 4105 vs Wynnum, QLD 4178

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moorooka wins 3, Wynnum wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoorookaWynnum
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$810K$880K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.66%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.90%-
1-year house growth+15.4%+10.0%
3-year house growth+49.5%+42.0%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.7%
Population10,78314,036

Moorooka vs Wynnum: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Moorooka and $1.4M in Wynnum.

For units, Moorooka sits at a median of $810K against $880K in Wynnum, which makes Moorooka the more affordable unit market and Wynnum the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.4% in Moorooka and +10.0% in Wynnum, so recent momentum favours Moorooka, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Moorooka houses are +49.5% and Wynnum houses +42.0%, so Moorooka has compounded faster than Wynnum over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Wynnum and 0.8% in Moorooka, so landlords in Wynnum face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wynnum is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,036 against 10,783, larger than Moorooka; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Moorooka for recent price momentum, Wynnum for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison