Skip to main content

Mossman vs Vincent

Property investment comparison - Mossman, QLD 4873 vs Vincent, QLD 4814

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mossman wins 2, Vincent wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMossmanVincent
Median house price$550K$550K
Median unit price$365K$510K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.89%4.70%
Gross rental yield (units)5.06%5.19%
1-year house growth+8.5%+14.5%
3-year house growth+18.4%+81.7%
Vacancy rate1.5%1.5%
Population1,9352,213

Mossman vs Vincent: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $550K in Mossman and $550K in Vincent.

For units, Mossman sits at a median of $365K against $510K in Vincent, which makes Mossman the more affordable unit market and Vincent the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mossman leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.89%, compared with 4.70% in Vincent, a gap of 1.19 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.5% in Mossman and +14.5% in Vincent, so recent momentum favours Vincent, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Mossman houses are +18.4% and Vincent houses +81.7%, so Vincent has compounded faster than Mossman over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.5%.

Vincent is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,213 against 1,935, larger than Mossman; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mossman for rental income, Vincent for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Mossman vs Vincent: Property Investment Comparison (2026)