Skip to main content

Mount Jukes vs Palm Cove

Property investment comparison - Mount Jukes, QLD 4740 vs Palm Cove, QLD 4879

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Jukes wins 2, Palm Cove wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMount JukesPalm Cove
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$730K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%4.05%
Gross rental yield (units)3.73%-
1-year house growth+13.5%+11.6%
3-year house growth-+14.2%
Vacancy rate0.9%0.5%
Population3732,450

Mount Jukes vs Palm Cove: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Mount Jukes and $1.2M in Palm Cove, so Mount Jukes is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Palm Cove leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.05%, compared with 3.13% in Mount Jukes, a gap of 0.92 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.5% in Mount Jukes and +11.6% in Palm Cove, so recent momentum favours Mount Jukes, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Palm Cove and 0.9% in Mount Jukes, so landlords in Palm Cove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Palm Cove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,450 against 373, roughly 7 times the size of Mount Jukes; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Palm Cove for rental income, Mount Jukes for a lower purchase price, Mount Jukes for recent price momentum, Palm Cove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison