Skip to main content

Mount Warren Park vs Whitfield

Property investment comparison - Mount Warren Park, QLD 4207 vs Whitfield, QLD 4870

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Warren Park wins 2, Whitfield wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMount Warren ParkWhitfield
Median house price$960K$960K
Median unit price$520K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.81%4.45%
Gross rental yield (units)4.78%5.46%
1-year house growth+17.8%+13.4%
3-year house growth+48.9%+34.4%
Vacancy rate1.7%0.8%
Population5,7364,262

Mount Warren Park vs Whitfield: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $960K in Mount Warren Park and $960K in Whitfield.

On cash flow, Whitfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.45%, compared with 3.81% in Mount Warren Park, a gap of 0.64 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.8% in Mount Warren Park and +13.4% in Whitfield, so recent momentum favours Mount Warren Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Mount Warren Park houses are +48.9% and Whitfield houses +34.4%, so Mount Warren Park has compounded faster than Whitfield over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Whitfield and 1.7% in Mount Warren Park, so landlords in Whitfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mount Warren Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,736 against 4,262, larger than Whitfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Whitfield for rental income, Mount Warren Park for recent price momentum, Whitfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison