Skip to main content

Mudgee vs Perthville

Property investment comparison - Mudgee, NSW 2850 vs Perthville, NSW 2795

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mudgee wins 2, Perthville wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMudgeePerthville
Median house price$740K$740K
Median unit price$510K$455K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.20%5.43%
1-year house growth+6.4%+5.2%
3-year house growth+5.7%+25.2%
Vacancy rate2.7%2.9%
Population11,457567

Mudgee vs Perthville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $740K in Mudgee and $740K in Perthville.

For units, Mudgee sits at a median of $510K against $455K in Perthville, which makes Perthville the more affordable unit market and Mudgee the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.4% in Mudgee and +5.2% in Perthville, so recent momentum favours Mudgee, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Mudgee houses are +5.7% and Perthville houses +25.2%, so Perthville has compounded faster than Mudgee over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.7% in Mudgee and 2.9% in Perthville, so landlords in Mudgee face less competition for tenants.

Mudgee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,457 against 567, roughly 20 times the size of Perthville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mudgee for recent price momentum, Mudgee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison