Skip to main content

Mullaloo vs Parkerville

Property investment comparison - Mullaloo, WA 6027 vs Parkerville, WA 6081

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mullaloo wins 3, Parkerville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMullalooParkerville
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$1.4M$695K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%2.84%
Gross rental yield (units)2.79%1.95%
1-year house growth+14.8%-
3-year house growth+59.1%-
Vacancy rate0.7%1.4%
Population6,1902,432

Mullaloo vs Parkerville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.5M in Mullaloo and $1.5M in Parkerville.

For units, Mullaloo sits at a median of $1.4M against $695K in Parkerville, which makes Parkerville the more affordable unit market and Mullaloo the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mullaloo leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.20%, compared with 2.84% in Parkerville, a gap of 0.36 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Mullaloo and 1.4% in Parkerville, so landlords in Mullaloo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mullaloo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,190 against 2,432, roughly 2.5 times the size of Parkerville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mullaloo for rental income, Mullaloo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison