Mundoo Island vs Port Adelaide
Property investment comparison - Mundoo Island, SA 5214 vs Port Adelaide, SA 5015
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mundoo Island wins 1, Port Adelaide wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Mundoo Island | Port Adelaide |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $865K | $870K |
| Median unit price | - | $700K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.32% | 3.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.51% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +15.3%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 0.6% |
| Population | 0 | 1,338 |
Mundoo Island vs Port Adelaide: what the numbers say
The median house price is $865K in Mundoo Island and $870K in Port Adelaide, so Mundoo Island is the cheaper entry point, with Port Adelaide houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Port Adelaide leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.32% in Mundoo Island, a gap of 0.58 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Port Adelaide and 0.8% in Mundoo Island, so landlords in Port Adelaide face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
In short: Port Adelaide for rental income, Mundoo Island for a lower purchase price, Port Adelaide for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison