Skip to main content

Murdoch vs Wonnerup

Property investment comparison - Murdoch, WA 6150 vs Wonnerup, WA 6280

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Murdoch wins 2, Wonnerup wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMurdochWonnerup
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$1.1M$230K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)-7.59%
1-year house growth+9.5%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%0.8%
Population3,352196

Murdoch vs Wonnerup: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Murdoch and $1.3M in Wonnerup, so Murdoch is the cheaper entry point, with Wonnerup houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Murdoch sits at a median of $1.1M against $230K in Wonnerup, which makes Wonnerup the more affordable unit market and Murdoch the pricier one.

On cash flow, Murdoch leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 3.00% in Wonnerup, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Wonnerup and 1.0% in Murdoch, so landlords in Wonnerup face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Murdoch is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,352 against 196, roughly 17 times the size of Wonnerup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Murdoch for rental income, Murdoch for a lower purchase price, Wonnerup for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison