Skip to main content

Murrumba Downs vs Ormeau

Property investment comparison - Murrumba Downs, QLD 4503 vs Ormeau, QLD 4208

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Murrumba Downs wins 1, Ormeau wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMurrumba DownsOrmeau
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$770K$810K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.83%
Gross rental yield (units)3.80%4.19%
1-year house growth+12.6%+17.1%estimate
3-year house growth+53.7%-
Vacancy rate1.3%0.8%
Population10,79515,938

Murrumba Downs vs Ormeau: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Murrumba Downs and $1.1M in Ormeau.

For units, Murrumba Downs sits at a median of $770K against $810K in Ormeau, which makes Murrumba Downs the more affordable unit market and Ormeau the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.6% in Murrumba Downs and +17.1% in Ormeau (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Ormeau, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Ormeau and 1.3% in Murrumba Downs, so landlords in Ormeau face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ormeau is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,938 against 10,795, larger than Murrumba Downs; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ormeau for recent price momentum, Ormeau for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison