Nagambie vs Wando Bridge
Property investment comparison - Nagambie, VIC 3608 vs Wando Bridge, VIC 3312
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Nagambie wins 1, Wando Bridge wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Nagambie | Wando Bridge |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $640K | $640K |
| Median unit price | $510K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.90% | 2.56% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.98% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +3.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -10.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | - |
| Population | 2,254 | 41 |
Nagambie vs Wando Bridge: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $640K in Nagambie and $640K in Wando Bridge.
On cash flow, Nagambie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 2.56% in Wando Bridge, a gap of 2.34 percentage points.
Nagambie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,254 against 41, roughly 55 times the size of Wando Bridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Nagambie for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison