Skip to main content

Nana Glen vs Pyree

Property investment comparison - Nana Glen, NSW 2450 vs Pyree, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Nana Glen wins 4, Pyree wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNana GlenPyree
Median house price$900K$905K
Median unit price$565K$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.67%3.97%
Gross rental yield (units)4.41%4.38%
1-year house growth+13.9%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%2.5%
Population1,132110

Nana Glen vs Pyree: what the numbers say

The median house price is $900K in Nana Glen and $905K in Pyree, so Nana Glen is the cheaper entry point, with Pyree houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Nana Glen sits at a median of $565K against $625K in Pyree, which makes Nana Glen the more affordable unit market and Pyree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Pyree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.97%, compared with 3.67% in Nana Glen, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Nana Glen and 2.5% in Pyree, so landlords in Nana Glen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Nana Glen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,132 against 110, roughly 10 times the size of Pyree; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Pyree for rental income, Nana Glen for a lower purchase price, Nana Glen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison