Narara vs Tascott
Property investment comparison - Narara, NSW 2250 vs Tascott, NSW 2250
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Narara wins 2, Tascott wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Narara | Tascott |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Median unit price | $730K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.31% | 5.34% |
| 1-year house growth | +7.6% | +6.2% |
| 3-year house growth | +0.0% | +7.4% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 1.9% |
| Population | 8,471 | 1,675 |
Narara vs Tascott: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Narara and $1.0M in Tascott.
Over the past year house prices moved +7.6% in Narara and +6.2% in Tascott, so recent momentum favours Narara, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Narara houses are +0.0% and Tascott houses +7.4%, so Tascott has compounded faster than Narara over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Narara and 1.9% in Tascott, so landlords in Narara face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Narara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,471 against 1,675, roughly 5 times the size of Tascott; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Narara for recent price momentum, Narara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison