Skip to main content

Narellan vs Penrith

Property investment comparison - Narellan, NSW 2567 vs Penrith, NSW 2750

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Narellan wins 1, Penrith wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNarellanPenrith
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$770K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.21%2.95%
Gross rental yield (units)4.14%4.80%
1-year house growth+6.9%+10.6%estimate
3-year house growth+12.9%-
Vacancy rate2.4%1.2%
Population3,35817,966

Narellan vs Penrith: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Narellan and $1.1M in Penrith, so Penrith is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Narellan sits at a median of $770K against $620K in Penrith, which makes Penrith the more affordable unit market and Narellan the pricier one.

On cash flow, Narellan leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.21%, compared with 2.95% in Penrith, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.9% in Narellan and +10.6% in Penrith (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Penrith, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Penrith and 2.4% in Narellan, so landlords in Penrith face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Penrith is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,966 against 3,358, roughly 5 times the size of Narellan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Narellan for rental income, Penrith for a lower purchase price, Penrith for recent price momentum, Penrith for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison