Neath vs Tolland
Property investment comparison - Neath, NSW 2326 vs Tolland, NSW 2650
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Neath wins 0, Tolland wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Neath | Tolland |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $625K | $625K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.60% | 4.19% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.70% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +10.6% | +19.9%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| Population | 430 | 3,459 |
Neath vs Tolland: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $625K in Neath and $625K in Tolland.
On cash flow, Tolland leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.19%, compared with 3.60% in Neath, a gap of 0.59 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +10.6% in Neath and +19.9% in Tolland (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Tolland, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 2.4%.
Tolland is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,459 against 430, roughly 8 times the size of Neath; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tolland for rental income, Tolland for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison