Neath vs West Bathurst
Property investment comparison - Neath, NSW 2326 vs West Bathurst, NSW 2795
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Neath wins 1, West Bathurst wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Neath | West Bathurst |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $625K | $625K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.60% | 4.64% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.70% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +10.6% | +9.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +25.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.4% | 2.0% |
| Population | 430 | 3,634 |
Neath vs West Bathurst: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $625K in Neath and $625K in West Bathurst.
On cash flow, West Bathurst leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.64%, compared with 3.60% in Neath, a gap of 1.04 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +10.6% in Neath and +9.7% in West Bathurst, so recent momentum favours Neath, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in West Bathurst and 2.4% in Neath, so landlords in West Bathurst face less competition for tenants.
West Bathurst is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,634 against 430, roughly 8 times the size of Neath; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: West Bathurst for rental income, Neath for recent price momentum, West Bathurst for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison