Skip to main content

New Beith vs Wamuran

Property investment comparison - New Beith, QLD 4124 vs Wamuran, QLD 4512

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: New Beith wins 3, Wamuran wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNew BeithWamuran
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$680K$845K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.38%3.18%
Gross rental yield (units)4.28%-
1-year house growth+17.5%+18.6%estimate
3-year house growth+38.1%-
Vacancy rate0.6%1.4%
Population5,6423,374

New Beith vs Wamuran: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in New Beith and $1.5M in Wamuran, so Wamuran is the cheaper entry point.

For units, New Beith sits at a median of $680K against $845K in Wamuran, which makes New Beith the more affordable unit market and Wamuran the pricier one.

On cash flow, New Beith leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.38%, compared with 3.18% in Wamuran, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.5% in New Beith and +18.6% in Wamuran (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Wamuran, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in New Beith and 1.4% in Wamuran, so landlords in New Beith face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

New Beith is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,642 against 3,374, larger than Wamuran; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: New Beith for rental income, Wamuran for a lower purchase price, Wamuran for recent price momentum, New Beith for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison