Newborough vs Speewa
Property investment comparison - Newborough, VIC 3825 vs Speewa, VIC 3585
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Newborough wins 2, Speewa wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Newborough | Speewa |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $500K | $505K |
| Median unit price | $310K | $320K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.85% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.53% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +14.6% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +13.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 1.1% |
| Population | 6,886 | 10,624 |
Newborough vs Speewa: what the numbers say
The median house price is $500K in Newborough and $505K in Speewa, so Newborough is the cheaper entry point, with Speewa houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Newborough sits at a median of $310K against $320K in Speewa, which makes Newborough the more affordable unit market and Speewa the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Speewa and 1.7% in Newborough, so landlords in Speewa face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Speewa is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,624 against 6,886, larger than Newborough; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Newborough for a lower purchase price, Speewa for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison