Skip to main content

Newcomb vs Swanpool

Property investment comparison - Newcomb, VIC 3219 vs Swanpool, VIC 3673

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Newcomb wins 3, Swanpool wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNewcombSwanpool
Median house price$645K$645K
Median unit price$510K$280K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.95%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)4.40%3.51%
1-year house growth+11.7%-
3-year house growth+11.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%3.0%
Population4,704227

Newcomb vs Swanpool: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $645K in Newcomb and $645K in Swanpool.

For units, Newcomb sits at a median of $510K against $280K in Swanpool, which makes Swanpool the more affordable unit market and Newcomb the pricier one.

On cash flow, Newcomb leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.95%, compared with 3.90% in Swanpool, a gap of 0.05 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Newcomb and 3.0% in Swanpool, so landlords in Newcomb face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Newcomb is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,704 against 227, roughly 21 times the size of Swanpool; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Newcomb for rental income, Newcomb for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison