Newrybar vs Wareemba
Property investment comparison - Newrybar, NSW 2479 vs Wareemba, NSW 2046
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Newrybar wins 2, Wareemba wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Newrybar | Wareemba |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3.2M | $3.3M |
| Median unit price | $1.1M | $1.5M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.02% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.47% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +4.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 4.3% | 1.1% |
| Population | 532 | 1,519 |
Newrybar vs Wareemba: what the numbers say
The median house price is $3.2M in Newrybar and $3.3M in Wareemba, so Newrybar is the cheaper entry point, with Wareemba houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Newrybar sits at a median of $1.1M against $1.5M in Wareemba, which makes Newrybar the more affordable unit market and Wareemba the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Wareemba and 4.3% in Newrybar, so landlords in Wareemba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Wareemba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,519 against 532, roughly 2.9 times the size of Newrybar; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Newrybar for a lower purchase price, Wareemba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison