Skip to main content

Nirimba vs Redlynch

Property investment comparison - Nirimba, QLD 4551 vs Redlynch, QLD 4870

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Nirimba wins 1, Redlynch wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNirimbaRedlynch
Median house price$920K$920K
Median unit price-$545K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%4.51%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.60%
1-year house growth+13.9%+16.9%
3-year house growth+31.8%+34.2%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.4%
Population2,22910,571

Nirimba vs Redlynch: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $920K in Nirimba and $920K in Redlynch.

On cash flow, Redlynch leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.51%, compared with 4.20% in Nirimba, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.9% in Nirimba and +16.9% in Redlynch, so recent momentum favours Redlynch, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Nirimba houses are +31.8% and Redlynch houses +34.2%, so Redlynch has compounded faster than Nirimba over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Nirimba and 1.4% in Redlynch, so landlords in Nirimba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Redlynch is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,571 against 2,229, roughly 4.7 times the size of Nirimba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Redlynch for rental income, Redlynch for recent price momentum, Nirimba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison