Skip to main content

Noble Park vs Tarcombe

Property investment comparison - Noble Park, VIC 3174 vs Tarcombe, VIC 3666

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Noble Park wins 3, Tarcombe wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNoble ParkTarcombe
Median house price$840K$845K
Median unit price$600K$365K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.66%3.08%
Gross rental yield (units)5.00%4.78%
1-year house growth+5.2%-
3-year house growth+15.4%-
Vacancy rate0.9%0.8%
Population32,25732

Noble Park vs Tarcombe: what the numbers say

The median house price is $840K in Noble Park and $845K in Tarcombe, so Noble Park is the cheaper entry point, with Tarcombe houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Noble Park sits at a median of $600K against $365K in Tarcombe, which makes Tarcombe the more affordable unit market and Noble Park the pricier one.

On cash flow, Noble Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.66%, compared with 3.08% in Tarcombe, a gap of 0.58 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Tarcombe and 0.9% in Noble Park, so landlords in Tarcombe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Noble Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 32,257 against 32, roughly 1008 times the size of Tarcombe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Noble Park for rental income, Noble Park for a lower purchase price, Tarcombe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison