Normanhurst vs Wallarah
Property investment comparison - Normanhurst, NSW 2076 vs Wallarah, NSW 2259
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Normanhurst wins 2, Wallarah wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Normanhurst | Wallarah |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.9M | $1.9M |
| Median unit price | - | $580K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.35% | 1.96% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.17% | 5.04% |
| 1-year house growth | -4.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +2.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 1.1% |
| Population | 5,387 | 344 |
Normanhurst vs Wallarah: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.9M in Normanhurst and $1.9M in Wallarah.
On cash flow, Normanhurst leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.35%, compared with 1.96% in Wallarah, a gap of 0.39 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Normanhurst and 1.1% in Wallarah, so landlords in Normanhurst face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Normanhurst is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,387 against 344, roughly 16 times the size of Wallarah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Normanhurst for rental income, Normanhurst for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison